Semantic xHTML Forms
Working with Ruby on Rails for the past four years has been great. Switching over from the PHP world was pretty easy, yet I do do some coding in that area from time to time. One great thing about Rails is its simplicity when it comes to creating a quick scaffold dump. In simple terms, it takes a database table and outputs a form element for each column into HTML. This is a quick way to visually start inputing data, but if you look at the source code, it is not very useful for designers.
The typical output for a scaffold dump is as follows:
<form>
<label for="email">Email</label><br/>
<input name="email" type="text" />
...
</form>
Pretty simple right? Now put on your CSS and designer hat. What do you think you could do with that output? Probably not a whole lot. That br tag is just horrendous.
This form is semi-accessible too, but we could make it even more accessible and also give more elements to work with for the CSS.
Enter the definition list
For all the forms I create and/or need to style I resort to using a definition list. By definition it fits perfectly with the use of forms. Typical forms come with two elements per column: a label and a corresponding entry field. The same thing comes with a definition list: a term (the label) and a definition (the entry field). Semantically this produces a double benefit — a more structured form for accessibility and just a few more elements to access through use of CSS.
<form>
<dl>
<dt><label for="email">Email</label></dt>
<dd><input name="email" type="text" /></dd>
...
</dl>
</form>
Granted we are introducing more markup, but I believe that is perfectly fine. The form now is ready for better CSS styling and defaults well when CSS is turned off or used by screen readers.
| September 2010 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | ||









0 shared their opinion. ADD YOURS »
Add your opinion here